[Prev][Index]
Privacy, 101 Lecture IV
- From: owner-privacy101@c2.org
- Date: Sat, 5 Nov 1994 16:35:35 -0800
- Subject: Privacy, 101 Lecture IV
- Apparently-To: privacy101-outgoing@infinity.c2.org
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
PRIVACY 101, LECTURE IV
Sender: owner-privacy101@c2.org
Precedence: bulk
LOCATIONAL INFORMATION RISKS
Greetings,
We're back in the saddle again. We will quickly follow this
lecture with Lecture V, Financial Information Risks. After that,
we will offer a lecture that covers health, lifestyle, political
and miscellaneous information risks. Previously, we had intended
to do these as separate lectures, but we think we should move on
to the more meaty "technique" lectures.
Sandy Sandfort
Duncan Frissell
November 1994
(c) 1994, Frissell and Sandfort
332 Bleecker St., #F-34
New York, NY 10014 USA
Permission is hereby granted to reproduce and distribute
any or all of "Privacy 101" provided this statement and
the above copyright notice and address are included.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Your enemies can do you a lot of indirect damage. They can loot
your bank accounts or slander your name. But to do you the very
worst harm--take away your freedom or even kill you--they need to
be able to lay their hands on you. And to do that, they need to
know where you are. Yet every day, most people willingly give
out information about where they live, work, go to school, eat,
drink and (presumably) be merry. With that sort of information
about you, anybody who wants to grab you, can. Why do we expose
ourselves to such risks? Here are some reasons why most people
give out location information:
* What risk? This is Clinton's tolerant, liberal America.
What do we Branch Davidians have to fear? (Or fill in
the blanks with your own choices of era, country, and
minority.)
* I don't give out that sort of information ... except to the
DMV, the census taker, the phone book, the paper boy, the
banker, the butcher, the baker, the candlestick maker, rich
man, poor man, beggerman, thief, doctor, lawyer, Indian
chief. (How many people have you given personal location
information to in the last month?)
* It can't be avoided. (Well, we'll just see about that
later on in this lecture series.)
What are the various sorts of location risks we run? To answer
this question, let's look at three different types of risk you
run when you tell people where you are.
Physical Risks
HOME--There's no place like it. But it is where you spend half
your time; often in your most vulnerable states--asleep, in the
shower, relaxed in front of the TV with your guard down. It is
also where you keep the things most dear to you--your jewelry,
your personal records, your spouse, your kids. All these are at
risk if the wrong people know where you live.
WORK--Not only do you spend nearly a third of your time at work,
it is usually the major contributor to your financial well being.
Enemies who know where you work can threaten your livelihood with
garnishment, slander, harassment, etc.
Informational Risks
SHOPPING--There are even location information risks associated
with shopping. Where you shop and (by inference) what you buy
tells a great deal about you and your lifestyle. We'll discuss
lifestyle risks in more detail in a later lecture, but for now,
do you really want your enemies to know how often you go to the
liquor store?
MEDICAL TREATMENT--If you tell people where you go for medical
treatment (physical and mental), you are also telling them where
they can find out some of the most personal information about
you. What risk might that mean in, say, a future law suit?
Let's see what difference.
Jurisdictional Risks
CHOICE OF LAW--What's right and what's wrong. It used to be easy
to tell but in a bureaucratic world right and wrong depend on
where you are. What's wrong in Peoria may be right in Singapore
and vice versa. Where you are determines many things about your
legal relationships. It is wise for you to control your legal
location.
Taxes that one owes depend on legal residence as well as
"presence in the jurisdiction." Many bureaucratic regulations
don't apply to "visitors" but only to residents of a given
jurisdiction.
PROCEDURAL JURISDICTION--Obviously it is harder to arrest or sue
those in other geographic areas or those whose exact location is
unknown. Letting others know where you are can be a major legal
hazard. Even if locational ambiguity does not offer an absolute
legal bar to lawsuits or prosecutions, it can put a *practical
barrier* in the way of such actions against you.
Modern Life
Luckily, as we shall see in the practical lectures, modern
privacy techniques make it easier than ever to disguise your
actual location and to carry on your normal affairs "from
anywhere to anywhere" on earth. We will demonstrate how to be
"legally absent" from a jurisdiction in which you are physically
present and show you how to be virtually present in a
jurisdiction from which you are actually and legally absent.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The "Privacy 101" seminar by Duncan Frissell and Sandy
Sandfort is digested and available on the WWW.
To reach the WWW digest, point your browser at
http://www.iquest.com/~fairgate/privacy/index.htm.