01-14-95 viper002. мллм мллм оллн мллллллллм млллллл ллллллм лллл лллл лл лллп пллл ллмммм лл лл лллл лллл лл лллм мллл ллпппп лллллл плллм млллп оллн лллллллллп плллллл лл плл плллллллп лллл плллп пллп VIOLENT PERFECTION (A Group which is doing this and that, while trying to find itself...) Disclaimer: The following text is written with the help of a few books, magazines and lots of imagination. by DAIMYO DEMOCRACY AT GUNPOINT (ViPer002.) After the end of World War II, most of this planet found itself in the role of an unwilling accomplice to the new war, which later came to be known as "Cold War." In the late 80's, the Cold War was over. And the looser of this war, which was Soviet Union, really did loose. Within the next few years, the empire lost much in the way of land, resources, jobs, economy, etc. At the same time, the winner found itself in the process of loosing political, economical and military power. As the Soviet Block broke into pieces, most communist regimes found themselves loosing control; while the opposition began taking over (without the support of United States). Within months, there was another explosion, a new wave of modern technologies, as well as crime and prejudice in the United States. At the same time, we found ourselves playing the role of a peace officer to the whole planet. Middle East, Somalia, Serbia, Middle East again, Haiti. It is as though our leaders find us new wars to fight as old ones get less and less popular. Some of US citizens just love that. Others? Well, others wonder about the reasons for our involvement in all those places. Lets look at those reasons! Centralized and strong governments arise because of the perception of unmet needs. They maintain power because they generate new perceptions of needs which are unmet or by fueling the impressions which lead to war, or both. Take away the perception of unmet needs, and strong governments find it increasingly difficult to maintain power without becoming even more tyrannical. So, is that what we are witnessing? As the threat of communist aggression dies, the government is trying to find other enemies? Shifting its sights to "alternative choices" on a long list of enemies? After all, the "War on Middle-Eastern Terrorism" has been going on for many years, but only now we are being given all the materials to look at. Ten years ago, nobody cared if a terrorist exploded a bomb on a street of some European city - now, it is Front Page material. Any power which merely opposes its own destruction or the loss of its territory almost never wins the ensuing conflict unless it defines its objectives beyond survival or the perpetuation of the status quo. And so, the United States government is just trying to survive. That is why most of the space research is being slowly shut down. New laws prohibiting different kinds of fire arms are being passed. And the government is attempting to take control of all kinds of communication networks in the country. There isn't that much money to be saved in shutting down NASA. But it effectively strips the economy of the need for high-tech, rocket and missile job opportunities. We are still being allowed to dream (through Science Fiction, computer networks, etc.), but we no longer have the means and opportunities of making those dreams into realities. As the government takes more control of the communications industry, it will slowly and carefully start to monitor (at first), and later determine what we think and do. As the laws on "bearing fire arms" get increase in severity. We will loose the ability to protect ourselves. And consequently, the ability to stand up to our own government. We are being stripped of our rights as the government gets more and more protective, trying to remain in power. P.S. The picture drawn above is a dark one, but it also is factual. True, those dusky clouds of governmental tyranny are not yet evident, but they are there, just over the horizon. And unless things change, by the year 2015 most of us will have no dreams, no voice and no power. January 14th, 1995. ViPer002.