Return-path: X-Andrew-Authenticated-as: 7997;andrew.cmu.edu;Ted Anderson Received: from beak.andrew.cmu.edu via trymail for +dist+/afs/andrew.cmu.edu/usr11/tm2b/space/space.dl@andrew.cmu.edu (->+dist+/afs/andrew.cmu.edu/usr11/tm2b/space/space.dl) (->ota+space.digests) ID ; Tue, 10 Apr 90 02:57:03 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: Reply-To: space+@Andrew.CMU.EDU From: space-request+@Andrew.CMU.EDU To: space+@Andrew.CMU.EDU Date: Tue, 10 Apr 90 02:56:40 -0400 (EDT) Subject: SPACE Digest V11 #245 SPACE Digest Volume 11 : Issue 245 Today's Topics: Re: Interview with head of Glavkosmos (long: 226 lines) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: 9 Apr 90 20:33:05 GMT From: agate!shelby!neon!jchapin@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU (John M. Chapin) Subject: Re: Interview with head of Glavkosmos (long: 226 lines) Dunayev's comments about ozone depletion really surprised me. If this hasn't been thrashed out in this newsgroup recently, would someone please comment on: 1) Is he correct in estimating that 300 shuttle launches could significantly affect the ozone layer? 2) If not, what is a good estimate for ozone depletion due to current and expected US space program activities? 3) As a reality check: is this important at all given global CFC emissions, etc? -John Chapin (jchapin@cs.stanford.edu) ------------------------------ End of SPACE Digest V11 #245 *******************