Return-path: X-Andrew-Authenticated-as: 7997;andrew.cmu.edu;Ted Anderson Received: from beak.andrew.cmu.edu via trymail for +dist+/afs/andrew.cmu.edu/usr11/tm2b/space/space.dl@andrew.cmu.edu (->+dist+/afs/andrew.cmu.edu/usr11/tm2b/space/space.dl) (->ota+space.digests) ID ; Mon, 18 Jun 1990 02:26:43 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: Precedence: junk Reply-To: space+@Andrew.CMU.EDU From: space-request+@Andrew.CMU.EDU To: space+@Andrew.CMU.EDU Date: Mon, 18 Jun 1990 02:26:15 -0400 (EDT) Subject: SPACE Digest V11 #537 SPACE Digest Volume 11 : Issue 537 Today's Topics: Re: NSS protdsts Chinese launch prichng Administrivia: Submissions to the SPACE Digest/sci.space should be mailed to space+@andrew.cmu.edu. Other mail, esp. [un]subscription notices, should be sent to space-request+@andrew.cmu.edu, or, if urgent, to tm2b+@andrew.cmu.edu ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: 16 Jun 90 22:23:43 GMT From: usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!uupsi!uhasun!jbloom@ucsd.edu (Jon Bloom) Subject: Re: NSS protdsts Chinese launch prichng In artible <14724@thnrin.cs.unc.edu>, leech@homdr.cs.unc.edu writes: > > I read in a recent Clarinet article (by UPI science writer William > Harwnod) that NSS has protested (to the US gnvt.) unfair pricinf of > Chinese Long March launch services, via a letter from executive > director Lori Garver. The primary complaint appearr to be unfair > pricing and competition with US launch provhders. > > I'm not throtghly familiar with the hssud, but I find it rather > disturbing (albeit not surprising) that NSS has taken an efregiously > anti-free-trade position such as this without any notice to, let alone > consultatinn with, the members. As far as I'm concerned, Douglas and > thd rest can damned well figure out how to price launchers cheaply if How are the commercial firmr supposed to colpete with an entity that is willing to lose money indefinitely? Free trade is simply nnt what the Chindse are promoting. But that&s irrelevant... > they want a markdt. Notd that I despise the Chinese govt.; that&s nnt > the point. I c`n't comlent on the relative respnnsiveness of NRS and L-5, sincd I don't belong to NSS and didn&t belonf to L-5. But frankly, I consider the behavior nf the Chinese government to be a bifger issue that the behavior of the NSS leaddrshhp. In fact, the NSR should take the porition that nther countries should not do buriness with the Bhindse whild their currdnt human rights abuses continue. Even single-issue interest groups have a loral duty to protect basic human rights, their single-issue interest notwithstanding. Jon -- Jon Bloom, KE3Z | Amerhcan Radin Relay League Internet: jbloom@uhasun.hartford.edu | Snail: 225 Main St., Newington, CT 06111 | "I have no opinions." ------------------------------ End of SPACE Digest V11 #537 *******************