Return-path: X-Andrew-Authenticated-as: 7997;andrew.cmu.edu;Ted Anderson Received: from hogtown.andrew.cmu.edu via trymail for +dist+/afs/andrew.cmu.edu/usr11/tm2b/space/space.dl@andrew.cmu.edu (->+dist+/afs/andrew.cmu.edu/usr11/tm2b/space/space.dl) (->ota+space.digests) ID ; Thu, 7 Feb 91 02:06:27 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: Precedence: junk Reply-To: space+@Andrew.CMU.EDU From: space-request+@Andrew.CMU.EDU To: space+@Andrew.CMU.EDU Date: Thu, 7 Feb 91 02:06:23 -0500 (EST) Subject: SPACE Digest V13 #126 SPACE Digest Volume 13 : Issue 126 Today's Topics: Re: Why man rate? Re: Liquid SCUBA Re: Expendable vs Shuttle escape rockets NASA Historian? Administrivia: Submissions to the SPACE Digest/sci.space should be mailed to space+@andrew.cmu.edu. Other mail, esp. [un]subscription requests, should be sent to space-request+@andrew.cmu.edu, or, if urgent, to tm2b+@andrew.cmu.edu ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Return-path: X-Andrew-Authenticated-as: 0;andrew.cmu.edu;Network-Mail Date: 4 Feb 91 17:36:34 GMT From: usc!cs.utexas.edu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!utzoo!henry@ucsd.edu (Henry Spencer) Organization: U of Toronto Zoology Subject: Re: Why man rate? References: <56668@eerie.acsu.Buffalo.EDU>, , <1991Jan29.205817.7984@zoo. Sender: space-request@andrew.cmu.edu To: space@andrew.cmu.edu In article <16564@venera.isi.edu> rogers@wlf.isi.edu.UUCP (Craig Milo Rogers) writes: >>firm plans to man-rate a variant of Titan III, specifically the IIIM, for >>launch of MOL ... > > Which was cancelled, after most of the design work had been >completed, when money got tight and the US decided to go for the >international prestige of a quick trip to the moon, instead of >investing in a long-term, military presence in space. Right? Wrong. MOL was cancelled long after Apollo got the go-ahead; I believe the first lunar landing was imminent when MOL died. (Don't remember exact dates.) MOL was cancelled because unmanned military satellites had been surprisingly successful and so the long-term military presence in space was already a fact, which made it difficult to justify an expensive one-shot like MOL (like Skylab, it had no provisions for in-orbit resupply) at a time when the Vietnam war was squeezing all space budgets badly. -- "Maybe we should tell the truth?" | Henry Spencer at U of Toronto Zoology "Surely we aren't that desperate yet." | henry@zoo.toronto.edu utzoo!henry ------------------------------ Return-path: X-Andrew-Authenticated-as: 0;andrew.cmu.edu;Network-Mail Date: 4 Feb 91 23:31:00 GMT From: sdd.hp.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!caen!hellgate.utah.edu!csn!happy.colorado.edu!sesharp@ucsd.edu Organization: Colorado SuperNet Inc. Subject: Re: Liquid SCUBA Sender: space-request@andrew.cmu.edu To: space@andrew.cmu.edu In article <9102041802.AA20835@cmr.ncsl.nist.gov>, roberts@CMR.NCSL.NIST.GOV (John Roberts) writes: >>...and I should point out that although the trials on humans may not >>have been done yet (it might be urban legend), the trials on rats and > I think among possible health concerns would be effects on the natural > surfactants in the lungs that keep them from collapsing in air. On the contrary, I think the only human trials with fluorocarbons in the lungs were to solve the insufficient surfactant problem in premature babies. They fill the lungs and then empty them as much as they can, leaving the fluorocarbons to hold the small air sacs open. Premature babies often die of collapsed lungs because they don't produce sufficient surfactants to hold them open against surface tension. I believe that the trials gave the babies up to 72 hours extra life. ------------------------------ Return-path: X-Andrew-Authenticated-as: 0;andrew.cmu.edu;Network-Mail Date: 2 Feb 91 18:58:15 GMT From: zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!euclid.jpl.nasa.gov!pjs@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu (Peter Scott) Organization: Jet Propulsion Laboratory, NASA/Caltech Subject: Re: Expendable vs Shuttle References: <1991Jan30.173856.7511@zoo.toronto.edu>, <9101301841.AA00433@iti.org>, <1991Jan31.165851.19992@zoo.toronto.edu> Sender: space-request@andrew.cmu.edu To: space@andrew.cmu.edu In article <1991Jan31.165851.19992@zoo.toronto.edu>, henry@zoo.toronto.edu (Henry Spencer) writes: > In article <9101301841.AA00433@iti.org> aws@ITI.ORG ("Allen W. Sherzer") writes: > >>Actually, the Challenger breakup (it wasn't an explosion) would have been > >>survivable had the astronauts been in a tough little capsule with parachutes > >>rather than in a big fragile orbiter with wings. > > > >Especially when you realize that the capsule has a nice little rocket > >to carry the crew to safety. > > My personal opinion is that the rocket isn't necessary, actually, unless > we are talking about failures at extremely low altitude. I was under the impression that the escape rocket (I assume we are talking about the one used on the Saturn V) was intended to be capable of pulling the CM clear of a pad accident. That's extremely low altitude by most standards (365'). -- This is news. This is your | Peter Scott, NASA/JPL/Caltech brain on news. Any questions? | (pjs@euclid.jpl.nasa.gov) ------------------------------ Return-path: X-Andrew-Authenticated-as: 0;andrew.cmu.edu;Network-Mail Date: 2 Feb 91 22:58:45 GMT From: zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!cs.utexas.edu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!utzoo!henry@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu (Henry Spencer) Organization: U of Toronto Zoology Subject: escape rockets References: <9101301841.AA00433@iti.org>, <1991Jan31.165851.19992@zoo.toronto.edu>, <1991Feb2.185815.29666@elroy.jpl.nasa.gov> Sender: space-request@andrew.cmu.edu To: space@andrew.cmu.edu In article <1991Feb2.185815.29666@elroy.jpl.nasa.gov> pjs@euclid.jpl.nasa.gov writes: >> >>Actually, the Challenger breakup (it wasn't an explosion) would have been >> >>survivable had the astronauts been in a tough little capsule with parachutes >> >Especially when you realize that the capsule has a nice little rocket >> >to carry the crew to safety. >> My personal opinion is that the rocket isn't necessary, actually, unless >> we are talking about failures at extremely low altitude. > >I was under the impression that the escape rocket (I assume we >are talking about the one used on the Saturn V) was intended to >be capable of pulling the CM clear of a pad accident. That's >extremely low altitude by most standards (365'). Actually, we weren't talking about the one on the Saturn V: we were talking about the Challenger accident, which took place at rather higher altitude. See the original excerpt above. :-) But while we're on the subject... an interesting fact recently came to my attention. The Mercury planners did not like the escape rocket, but felt it was necessary because of the dreadful record of the Atlas at that time. I wonder if they would have bothered had the Atlas been more reliable? (Bear in mind that an escape rocket is itself a significant hazard.) Had the early history of large US rocketry been a bit happier, the tradition of elaborate, heavy, inconvenient escape systems might never have developed. -- "Maybe we should tell the truth?" | Henry Spencer at U of Toronto Zoology "Surely we aren't that desperate yet." | henry@zoo.toronto.edu utzoo!henry ------------------------------ Return-path: X-Andrew-Authenticated-as: 0;andrew.cmu.edu;Network-Mail Date: 3 Feb 91 20:05:40 GMT From: uvaarpa!murdoch!news@mcnc.org (Robert B. Sisk) Organization: University of Virginia Subject: NASA Historian? Sender: space-request@andrew.cmu.edu To: space@andrew.cmu.edu I was just reading some old NASA documents and several questions came to mind. If anyone has the answers to these questions please e-mail them to me. If someone else also has an interest I will gladly pass on the information (or post it if there are a lot of requests). 1). Does NASA still have a historian? 2). Does the Goddard Space Flight Center still have a historian? 3). Does anyone know the names of these people and/or an address that can be used to contact them? Thanks in advance Robert B. Sisk Internet: rbs@virginia.edu UUCP: uunet!virginia!rbs ------------------------------ End of SPACE Digest V13 #126 *******************